Categories
title loans locations

CASH LOAN INC v. HARRIS. After Harris encountered difficulties repaying the attention due on her behalf loans, she filed suit, separately as well as on behalf of similarly situated people, against E-Z Cash.

CASH LOAN INC v. HARRIS. After Harris encountered difficulties repaying the attention due on her behalf loans, she filed suit, separately as well as on behalf of similarly situated people, against E-Z Cash.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

E-Z CASH LOAN, INC. v. Deborah HARRIS.

No. 01-570.

Determined: 06, 2001 december

Appellant E-Z advance loan, Inc., appeals your order regarding the Pulaski County Circuit Court doubting its motion to compel arbitration. For reversal, E-Z Cash contends that a contract finalized by Appellee Deborah Harris included a valid arbitration clause, hence preventing her from filing suit in circuit court. We disagree, and therefore, affirm.

This appeal is due to a dispute about the legality of particular loan deals involving E-Z Cash and Harris. E-Z money is a corporation this is certainly in the business http://yourloansllc.com/title-loans-ri of supplying money loans to people who provide individual checks which are held until the debtor’s next payday. These deals are generally named “payday loans.” In June 2000, Harris presented E-Z Cash with a personal sign in the quantity of $400 it decided to hold until Harris’s next payday. Harris ended up being necessary to go back to E-Z money to either redeem the mortgage for the face that is full of this check or even to restore the mortgage. She chose to restore the mortgage if you are paying the attention and presenting a brand new search for the initial number of the bucks received, plus one more solution cost for the extensive term. Within the transaction, Harris finalized an “Arkansas Deferred Presentment Agreement,” saying that there clearly was a check cashing cost of $40, also a $10 deferred presentment cost.